|
Question 1: "Jerome - I saw the transfer Swiss Effects did
of the film,
EVERYTHING PUT TOGETHER directed by Marc Forster. What
impressed me was
that even though the film was shot on a Sony VX1000 - a mere
toy to most professional filmmakers - the actual result was
stunning once transferred to film. Why is it that this film
looked so good compared to most other films that have been
transferred from dv to film?"
|
|
|
Thanks for your interest in Swiss Effects and the compliments regarding
"Everything Put Together." I think it is one of our finest examples of
tape to film. Roberto Schaefer did a wonderful job as DP. It was shot
in PAL and I think that is important as to why it looked so good --
particularly the shots where he played with the shutter speed to show the
emotional distress in the scenes in the halls of the storage facility.
At Sundance, I ran into
Peter Broderick
and he was bemoaning how many of
the dv projects looked bad at Sundance and why should this be so when
there is so much experience to draw upon. Well, the answer I told him is
that there is also a lot of misinformation out there and people listen to
the wrong answers as carefully as they do the correct answers. Also,
people want to believe things that just are not true in the real world of
tape to film.
Roberto Schaffer -- Antony Dodd Mantle ( 28 days later)-- these are big guns. Very
talented people. Picasso's with toy cameras. There is no "exact" as
they work as craftsman and artist -- developing and tweaking along the
way. Roberto used our
VX 1000 camera specs
-- and I think he used the
anamorphic adapter -- but the rest is sheer talent. No secrets. It is
not the camera but the brilliance or weakness of the DP and director.
The camera is a pencil.
|
|
|
Question 2: "You mentioned the importance of PAL - why is
it so important to shoot in this format as opposed to NTSC?
Also, will the film mode (progressive scan) on some cameras
make a difference?"
|
|
|
The PAL issue is important.
If you are not going to shoot in PAL you have to be thinking of a bigger
camera or more stringent shooting requirements -- less movement -- less
of everything as you have 100 less lines of resolution and the 3/2 pull
down will be a nightmare in any language.
At the end of the day, PAL isn't a magic format that will
automatically guarantee you the kind of results seen in
"Everything Put Together". Your DP has to be good. This is important.
It is also important to NOT
use the "progressive scan" or "film mode" settings on any of these
inexpensive consumer/prosumer cameras.
Don't worry about interlacing removing -- shoot interlace on small dv
cameras. Interlace trumps fake progressive scan or movie mode any day
for film out. Do a test to film and prove it to yourself.
|
|
|
Question 3: "How much are the tests that you offer?"
|
|
|
You might consider doing atwo minute test with your DP
and experiment with achieving the look you desire. This is so important
and it seems only the really experienced DP's take the time to do these
tests. Two minutes to 35mm is $600 and the price comes off the final
transfer cost if you go with Swiss Effects.
Everyone worries about this outlay of bread but it saves so much money
and time in the end that it is foolish, in my mind, to go into production
without spending the time and energy to do a test. Even myself, who have
worked on probably 60 dv to 35mm features, would not go into production
without doing extensive tests. It helps bring everyone together on the
same page.
The cost I quoted - $600 - is our cost without profit margin.
It is a serious offer at doing something basically for free, on our
part, for your benefit -- we still have to pay Kodak, Federal Express and
the light bill. A two minute test is hours of work. Looking at the
test, analyzing it -- making decisions and recommendations. All that.
When the test is done we will send you back your original
dv tape, plus the 35mm film negative.
|
|
|
Question 4: "Any final words of advise for filmmakers who
want to ensure that they get the best video and look possible
in case a distributor picks up the movie and pays
for a transfer to film?"
|
|
|
First off, don't buy -- rent. Prices and cameras are changing very
fast. New cameras with new goods and bads are slated to come out and
people who own the PD 150 (PAL) will probably be looking to upgrade to
the next cheerleader. As a consumer -- dv movie makers are the new
consumer of product -- you are going to be told to buy this, buy that --
so and so is better -- if you want to be the best you have to have it.
All that garbage. Put it out of your mind and work with what you have.
Your mind, not your credit card, makes the movie. For this reason,
also, I say buy a camera for your learning process -- burn it up -- but
rent a camera when it is time to say "action."
With dv filmmaking, there are no answers, only alternatives.
You have to stop looking for
the right way and find your own way which you are happy with. Shoot
video -- hours of it -- learn how to hold the camera -- any camera --
shoot hours and hours. Work on focus issues, framing issues. When you
decide to make a movie make sure the camera is PAL and don't shoot
progressive scan option on the baby cameras. Those are probably the most
tried and true rules. Also, invest money, time, -- anything -- in a
trusted sound person.
|
|
|