|
Question 1: "Andreas, could you begin by telling us a little
about yourself, your influences, and how and why you became involved
in the film industry?"
|
|
|
Well, I was born 28 years ago in a small town
in western Germany. After school I started
working as a 3D graphic designer for Playstation
games. During my years in this business I
felt that my occupation left me
with great emptiness (and I still believe
that the video game is the most overrated media
of our time). Therefore I applied at the German
Film and Television Academy in Berlin (DFFB), where
I am still studying at the moment. “Tag 26” was
my third short film at the academy.
My influences in general originate maybe more
from comic books, which I loved in my childhood.
Among todays filmmakers I would name Aki Kaurismäki,
because of his honesty and humane humour and
David Lynch, because his films cannot be described
in words. Concerning “Tag 26”, I would name
Tarkovskij´s “Stalker” as the main influence.
|
|
|
Question 2: "Your film 'TAG 26' ranks as one of the best short films
I have ever seen, along with masterpieces such as David Ward's
'Sixty Cups of Coffee' and Steve Ayson's 'The French Doors'.
Please tell
us a little bit about where you got the idea from, and how
you managed to
get the film into development."
|
|
|
Thanks for the lovely compliment! First,
there was more of a feeling of the film`s
atmosphere than the story itself. Also, the
music was there long before the idea of making
the film. I ran into that CD at the “Staalplaat”
Music Store in Amsterdam several years ago, and
although the track constists basically of nothing
more than one strange tone, it attracted me in a
fascinating way.
Inspired by this music, I wanted to make a film about
this final and most fearful threat, which is invisible.
This was then the challenge for me and the DoP, Max
Penzel, who was involved in the project very early –
to capture something invisible on film.
As making a film with almost no dialogue and having
actors´ faces hidden behind masks for most of the
movie, I also regarded it as an interesting experiment,
and the script was pretty controversally received
by the school´s script teachers.
|
|
|
Question 3: "I have showed the film to quite a few filmmakers, and the
general consensus is that the film would make a brilliant start to a feature
film. Do you have any plans to extend the idea into a feature in the
near future? If so, please can you provide details on how you plan
to approach this project? If not, what do you plan to do next?"
|
|
|
No, I don´t plan to turn “Tag 26” into a
feature film. Perhaps it seems like the start
of a feature, because it has quite a long
exposition for a short film, but it also tells
its story till the end. Turning it into a
feature would only make it longer, but not better.
I´m currently in the editing room with a 30-minutes
TV comedy I shot this summer. For the near future,
I will have to write a script for my diploma film,
which will hopefully be a feature length film, in
case I get it financed... So far, I have no
concrete idea what it will be about.
|
|
|
Question 4: "What was the budget for TAG 26? Did the film manage
to meet this target?"
|
|
|
The budget we got from the film academy was
2.500 Euros, but it was obvious from the very
beginning that this film would be much more
expensive. Eventually we finished the film for
about 7.000 Euros, with me and Max sharing the extra
costs. But without the extensive post production
sponsorings that we were able negotiate with VCC
Hamburg and ARRI Munich, the film would probably
have ended up three times more expensive...
|
|
|
Question 5: "How long did it take to shoot the film?
Can you tell us a
little
bit about the shoot and how smoothly it ran?"
|
|
|
We had 7 days of shooting on this small “farm”, which
is nowadays used as weekend house. The location is about
70km away from Berlin, close to the Polish border, in
the middle of nowhere.
In general, the shoot ran rather smoothly. With
three quarters of the film beeing shot outside,
the mixed weather costed us quite some time waiting
for sunshine, which made our real shooting time
pretty busy. But I guess that´s always the case in
European climate.
Further, we regularly had to shoot extra takes,
because we had birds, insects, cars and so on in
the frame. And we wanted it all dead.
Wearing those suits was quite a physical demand for
the actors. During straight sunshine in early afternoon
they could only stay in the suits for a few minutes,
but they took it with good humour.
Unfortunately, we had to re-shoot three shots 3
months later in autumn during heavy rain underneath
a tent, but you would never guess which shots they
are, and I won´t tell anyone...
The sound you hear in the film is all foley. We recorded
primary sound during the shoot as a reference.
|
|
|
Question 6: "What advice would you give to up-and-coming filmmakers
regarding the production of a short film?"
|
|
|
As a practical advice I´d say, don´t put your private
money into your films. Although it turned out well
in our case, it´s not advisable. Filmmaking is simply
way too expensive, and should be treated as a profession,
not as hobby.
Besides, the most important and simply crucial thing
about filmmaking in general is having an attitude
towards the story you want to tell, even if it is a
romantic comedy. If you don´t have a personal attitude
you will be lost in the millions of possibilities
the medium offers.
|
|
|
Question 7: "Finally, Is there anything else you would like to add - any
hard lessons you have learnt that you wish to make others aware of, or
any points you would like to stress?"
|
|
|
Maybe some final advice to TV stations and
movie publishers: You should better take a good
look at the short film festivals - there are
so many shorts out there which are so much better
than most of the crap that is regularly shown on
TV and in the cinema. They´re all available, and
should be presented to a larger audience.
|
|
|