|
theunseenfilm.com
|
|
|
Kev - tell us a bit about your horror/sci-fi film "The Unseen"?
|
|
|
‘The Unseen’ is a feature length horror movie completed in 2004.
Shot on DV, the story tells of a shape changing alien beast that
takes over a remote English village, killing the inhabitants. A
group of speleologists, on their way home from an expedition
stop off at the village and uncover the deadly secret. They
then become trapped in a forest that surrounds the area and have
to try and escape back to civilization.
The idea for ‘The Unseen’ was conceived in 2001. I was
having a break from my own film-making after graduating
from university in 1999 and decided I needed to get back
to making my own films. I’d worked on several other
projects between 1999 and 2001, but these were other people’s
films (features and shorts) and I was usually doing camera
work or working as assistant director. Some of the films
were good, others not so good, and I felt I had to get
back into writing and directing my own films. I wasn’t
quite sure whether to continue with my experimental short
films (which had been critically well received) or move
into more mainstream movie-making and start directing horror
films. I decided to be honest with myself and what I
really wanted to do was make independent horror movies.
Soon after, the premise for ‘The Unseen’ was born.
I’d mainly worked using Beta SP until that point, but with DV becoming
so cheap, I decided to invest in a DV camera and some other film
equipment and start making ‘The Unseen’. The idea was an amalgam
of elements of some of my favourite films such as ‘The Thing’,
‘Southern Comfort’, ‘The Evil Dead’ and the ‘Quatermass’ films
but written around an original screenplay. I wrote the script,
raised funding for the actual production and advertised on
shooting people for cast and crew. The production took off very
quickly and a few months later in the summer of 2002, we began shooting.
|
|
|
How did you first decide you wanted to be a filmmaker? Was there a
moment or a situation that made you realise that it was the path for you?
|
|
|
I’d always been a film buff but until I was eighteen I had studied and
wanted to do painting at degree level. It was then at art college that I
discovered a film-making course and signed up. I ended up specialising
in that, ditched the painting and went on to do a degree and master’s
degree in film and video production. I’ve never looked back since
although the painter side is still very much with me and is a great
bonus. Most film-makers I know can’t draw for shit and don’t have a
great eye for composition. Painting has helped me have a strong eye
for composition and every production I’ve worked on this has been evident.
|
|
|
Growing up, what kind of films influenced you? You are well known for your
love of Italian Horror, but I assume there's a bit of sci-fi and even
surrealist in there?
|
|
|
Yes I’ve always loved horror, and even bad horror.
My interest in more experimental film came from my background
in painting and through studying avant-garde and experimental
film at University. Directors like Jan Svankmajer, John Smith
and Luis Bunuel and interested me a lot in those days and still do today.
Science fiction has always been a passion as well. The Quatermass
films and TV serials, along with 50s B-movies have shared a place
on my video shelves with Italian and American horror for many
years. I also write articles and conduct interviews with key
players in Italian horror cinema for magazines, websites and
DVD supplements. Italian horror cinema of the 70s and early
80s is, I believe, where a lot of the best horror cinema in
history has been made. Although these films have gained a cult
following over the years, they are still relatively unknown
to most mainstream horror fans. Lucio Fulci’s ‘Zombi 2’ and
Ruggero Deodato’s ‘Cannibal Holocaust’ are two classic pieces
of horror / exploitation cinema are really groundbreaking
films of their time and still pack a heavy punch today.
|
|
|
I heard you have a master’s degree in Experimental Film. What kind
of things did you cover on the course, and did that help you to
become the twisted, gore-fest filmmaker you are today?
|
|
|
My Master's degree was a very practical based course but as
it was experimental it wasn't about making commercial shorts,
or drama shorts. You had to use the film/video camera in the
same manner as an artist would use a paintbrush. Therefore you
wouldn’t necessarily make films that were scripted or that had a
full cast and crew. You could make more improvisational works or
films that explored an idea or theme. We would have lectures
and workshops on how to use equipment i.e. cameras, editing,
printing facilities but the choice of projects was very much
of our own choosing. Most of the people were very weak
technically on their films and I always addressed this by
making experimental films that were also technically proficient.
Many of the films I made were based on little ideas and were very
dreamlike in their look and feel. I was interested in Surrealist
and Abstract Expressionist film at the time and many of my films
were made using this approach. One film I was particularly pleased
with was a short called Insect Noir. This film focused on a child
who experiencing hallucinatory dreams about a corridor containing
nightmare imagery. This was based on a recurring dream I had
myself when I was a child. The film was shot on black & white
super 8mm film and went on to be shown at a number of festivals.
|
|
|
I heard ‘The Unseen’ had a budget of £5,000 yet boasted some very
impressive effects/models as well as a professional cast and crew.
Could you break down the budget for the film for us?
|
|
|
I had purchased a lot of digital equipment prior to filming ‘The Unseen’,
not just for this production but also for future films. This kept the
budget down to a bare minimum. The total spent on the actual production
of ‘The Unseen’ was £5,000.
The majority of the budget went on the material costs for the
special effects artists (£2k) plus cast & crew travel expenses
and lunch (£1500). There were a few things we had to hire such as
additional lights and we paid a small fee for a few of the locations.
Nobody was paid a wage though and all worked for the experience
and for any net profits we make from selling the film. The shoot
was for a period of 25 days, so the travel and food costs mounted
up over this time as you can imagine.
The special effects ranged from elaborate animatronics (dog corpse,
exploding head) to the quite simple (alien claws). There were other
effects like the space capsule wreckage and an alien cadaver that
had to be made and this work was divided between three special effects
artists. They collaborated on some of the effects and worked individually
on others. The results were very impressive for such an incredibly
low budget production.
The cast were an interesting bunch. Most had acted in film and television
prior to ‘The Unseen’ although there were a few new-comers. This did
prove difficult at times and on occasion there was a struggle to get
the desired performance. Fantasy movies are difficult because there
are such a range of emotions that an actor/actress has to express.
For example, the character of Anna has to go through practically
every emotion in the film, from humour, romance, to fear, terror
and the final revelation that she is alone in the world. Elizabeth
Healey did a sterling job portraying Anna and the mysterious Dawson
(played by Craig Stovin) was also very memorable. Overall I was
quite pleased with the performances and some of the cast have gone
on to act in some quite big productions with high profile casts.
|
|
|
There is much debate in the film industry on shooting day-for-night,
and I noticed your film had a few shots like that. How did you achieve
these shots? Were you happy with the results and would you consider shooting day-for-night again?
|
|
|
Day for night is something that has been done for decades on many
films (from big budget Hollywood films to zero budget shorts).
Look at the Western genre and you'll nearly always see day for
night filming. A give away is always the blue sky and even clouds
visible and to be honest it is never very convincing. Yet audiences
have grown accustomed to it and generally accept that it is meant
to be night time. When shooting on a smaller format such as DV and
doing most of it in camera, it becomes even more of a challenge.
The simplest way of achieving day for night is to avoid shooting
the sky and to set the white balance to tungsten on your camera.
Then drop the aperture a few stops but no so as to lose too much
detail (you can tweak it in post later) and shoot. My camera man
on ‘The Unseen’ wasn't too convinced by day for night and I must
admit in hindsight I'm not overly convinced either. But on a zero
budget shoot in a forest it is near impossible to bring lights in
and power them, not to mention getting your cast and crew to work
through the night. True we could have hired a generator to power
some lights but then we would have had a noise problem. As all the
sound was recorded live on ‘The Unseen’, it just wasn’t feasible
so we chose day for night. Some of the shots are quite impressive
and far better than in much bigger budget productions. One of my
favourite movies, ‘Quatermass 2’ features some appalling day for
night filming in bright sunlight, yet the film still works.
The best advice I can give is to try and avoid too many night scenes
when writing your script unless you can light them. There are a few night
scenes in my next film ‘Soldiers of the Dead’ but we are hoping to get
a bigger budget and crew so that we can light these scenes properly.
|
|
|
A lot of people who start out to make their first film may
struggle with the actual role of being a director. People have
various approaches, some being more hands-on, and others preferring
to be much more passive. What approach did you take, and what advice
would you give to young filmmakers about the art of direction?
|
|
|
I don’t believe any director can be passive, especially on a low
budget film as the whole production would probably fall apart.
Because I had written the script for ‘The Unseen’ and was directing
and producing, the film was very much my own vision. Therefore
I had to be hands on and explain every minute detail of what
everyone was doing and what was happening in each scene. One
thing a director has to realise is that film-making is all
about compromises and you have to have a knowledge of how to
alter something on the day. Some directors get upset because
they can’t get a certain shot in the day that they had dreamed
about prior to the shoot. Adapting to circumstances is an essential
skill of a low budget director.
The most important thing is getting sufficient coverage so that the scene
can work, even on a basic level. If you spend too much time on one shot
that is only of an aesthetic concern then you run the risk of missing
out a shot that is more vital to make the scene work. If you have the
time then do it, but also get an idea of how many set ups you're
going to achieve in one day. The way I wanted to shoot ‘The Unseen’
was far more elaborate initially, but we had to compromise mainly
due to the length of time it was taking to light the scenes and get
the sound right. I also simplified the ending due to it being beyond
the scope of the budget.
|
|
|
What would you say are the main pitfalls that young filmmakers
could fall into on their first film? How would you recommend
avoiding these?
|
|
|
There’s no easy answer or quick fix when it comes to learning film-making.
Film-making is a craft and you have to make your mistakes and learn
from them. The internet along with cheap technology has led everyone
to believe they can be a director. Really this is all about ego and
a desire to be famous. Everyone wants to be famous at the moment and
you only have to look at the sheer desperation of people on talent
shows like ‘The X Factor’ to see this. And as we know though, most
of these people have no talent and are absolutely crestfallen when they are told so.
A lot of people rush into their films without properly preparing
for the shoot. Pre-production costs nothing and basic things like
getting a storyboard or scouting locations properly are so important.
If the director turns up on the day of shooting having not
planned things properly, they’re just going to waste everyone’s
time and things can only go wrong. Plan everything meticulously beforehand!
Know how you are going to edit the film when you shoot a scene
to avoid wasting time on long takes that will never be used. On
‘The Unseen’ we spent ages getting the sound right on a number of
wide shots and going through the entire scene sometimes. In
hindsight this was unnecessary as the wide shots were only used at
the start or end of the scene and the sound was mostly taken from
the closer shots. Basically, this wasted time that could have been
spent getting better close ups for coverage. If you’re shooting
with live sound, think about how you’re going to use the sound beforehand.
Sound is often criminally ignored on no budget movies. Whilst DV
can look bad sometimes, if you have good sound then the audience
is far more forgiving. All of the dialogue on ‘The Unseen’ was
recorded live on location using a DAT recorder and shotgun mics.
This was a real test and although it took sometime to get right,
and occasionally at the loss of a close up it worked very well. I
wouldn’t recommend ADR-ing your film unless you have the facilities
to do so in your budget. ADR can sound very false if done
incorrectly and can ruin the audience’s suspension of disbelief.
|
|
|
As well as directing ‘The Unseen’, you also produced the film.
What makes an effective producer? Would you have done anything
differently? Will you produce your next film?
|
|
|
The producer ultimately provides the tools for the director to do his
job. They’re also the one who is ultimately in charge of the
production and will steer it in the direction that it needs to go.
The director is not the biggest man on the shoot, it is the producer.
On ‘The Unseen’ I was in charge of co-ordinating the entire
shoot as well as directing it. This is not an ideal situation
but we had such a tiny crew on the film that it was the only
choice. Plus I knew precisely how the project was to be co-ordinated
on a day to day basis so I had no problem doing it. It did
occasionally feel like a one man band and I wish I could have
had more time devoted solely to the directing side but this was
incredibly low budget cinema. I had two executive producers on
the film, but their only real input was a little financing and
help on the occasional day – the rest was down to me.
I may co-produce my next film, however I really want to concentrate
on directing therefore the main producer duties will fall on
somebody else’s shoulders. Getting a good producer for a low budget
film is much more difficult than finding a good director. I
have a producer lined up for ‘Soldiers of the Dead’ and as he
is a big zombie fan, film-maker and has written books on zombie
movies, so is clearly the guy to lead this particular project in
the right direction. We also share a love of war movies and
Italian horror and are therefore bound to work well together
and steer the movie to success.
|
|
|
Logistically, which scene in ‘The Unseen’ was the hardest to shoot, and why?
|
|
|
I wouldn’t say any one scene was that difficult to shoot
logistically. Most of the filming took place in a large
wood in Hertfordshire and every day we’d all meet up in
the nearby village about 9am each day and head down to the
woods with all the equipment. We’d find the spot we were
going to shoot a certain scene and begin setting up. The
make-up for the cast would take a while, so while that was
going on the cast would rehearse and I’d work with them and also
plan precisely how we’d cover each scene. The sound recordist
would wander off and get some ambient sounds for the day and
about an hour later when everything was ready we’d begin shooting.
We’d have about half hour for lunch and wrap for the day no
later than 5.30pm. The shoot was great and everyone got along
famously. I believe part of the reason for this is that everyone
was treated well. There were no 12 hour days where the cast and
crew were worked into the ground as is so common on low budget
shoots. Therefore everyone was energised on each day of the shoot,
which was a good thing as the weather did try and ruin the
shoot on more than one occasion.
The entire film was made within a five mile radius of my home town
Letchworth. The villages, woods, interiors were all within easy
reach so we never had to travel too far with all the equipment.
We had one sequence involving the wreckage from a space capsule
that required setting up in the woods along with some smoke effects.
This took a little while to get right but wasn’t too difficult.
The finished result was one of my favourite scenes in the film.
|
|
|
‘The Unseen’ has quite an ambitious script for a low-budget film.
When planning ‘The Unseen’, did you decide to put the script first,
and worry about budget limitations
later, or did you always have the budget in mind?
|
|
|
I calculated what the film would cost to shoot and the minimum I could
make it for would be a few thousand pounds. However we required several
special effects scenes that would cost a bit to produce so the total
ended up at £5,000. I did alter the original script a fair bit to make
it more realistic within the budget. The ending for example was far
more elaborate than the relatively low key ending in the final cut.
I believe the one in the film works better but in the original, Anna
makes it back to civilisation and ends up in a police station.
However she’s horrified to discover the entire town is infected.
There were also scenes involving soldiers (that Dawson mentions
late on in the film) who try and stop the protagonists escaping. We
didn’t have the resources at the time to do these scenes so I
wrote the ending with Anna being led back to the village and finishing
up wandering off towards civilisation unsure of her humanity.
|
|
|
The film is finished. Where did you go from there? Is there a game
plan for getting the film distribution, and are there any steps
you would recommend for other filmmakers who find themselves
with a finished film, but no idea how to get it seen by distributors?
|
|
|
The film is currently being submitted to a number of festivals
worldwide. These are mainly ones where there isn’t an entry fee
(I don’t agree that there should be a charge for submitting your
work to a film festival, especially if it is an independent film
festival). Also the subject matter doesn’t fit in with most festivals,
which would much rather see a film council funded short that
attempts to tackle issues of race and gender, than an apocalyptic alien movie!
We are currently seeking distribution for home video and DVD;
however in the mean time the film will be available from our
website from early 2005 in a special edition DVD. Several
distributors have expressed a keen interest thus far. By far
the most amusing was a well known UK distributor who wanted to
buy the film, but wanted to guarantee an 18 certificate and
suggested shooting a few extra gore scenes. I toyed with the
idea for a little while, but the film is finished and I have
several new projects I’d rather concentrate on. Plus anyone
with knowledge of film brokering knows that the home video
rights for a low budget movie aren’t anything to get too excited
about. Therefore the idea of funding additional scenes was a no go.
‘The Unseen’ comes across as quite retro at times – a mixture of
1950s and 1970s sci-fi horror and that makes it difficult to
market as a new film. Ironically if I’d made a gore-fest
(which is what I didn’t want to do) the film may well be in
Blockbusters now!
However I’m also quite excited about the prospect
of independently releasing the film. I get to put
precisely what I want onto the DVD which will include a
director’s commentary, a making of, deleted scenes, bloopers,
unused footage, still galleries, storyboards and much more.
|
|
|
Finally, there is a lot of buzz going around about your new
film, Soldiers of the Dead. What can you tell us about this film?
|
|
|
‘Soldiers of the Dead’ is a full blown World War II horror feature
film with an incredibly simple yet effective premise. I can’t
give away too much of the plotline at present, but the script will
be touted around in 2005 with the aim of securing the funding
necessary to do the idea justice. We plan to shoot the film on high-definition
(HD). I’ve talked about the idea to several well known
directors who’ve all said it’s an excellent premise and
one that could be more popular than the recent British horror
films like ’28 Days Later’ and ‘Dog Soldiers’. It can be
shot relatively cheaply too so we’ve high hopes of getting
this project off the ground. I really can’t wait for this
project, but before that I have two other features to direct,
the first of which is ‘Zombie: Passage of Darkness’ and the
other is a horror/ghost story as yet untitled that will be shot on HD.
|
|